Your FIRE Number: the 4% Rule, Lean, Fat and Coast
Quick answer
Your FIRE number is annual expenses divided by your safe withdrawal rate — 25 times your spending at the commonly cited 4% rate, or about 29 times at a more cautious 3.5%. Because the target is set by spending rather than income, cutting annual expenses lowers the number you need by 25 times the saving. The 4% rule came from historical US market data and is a starting point, not a guarantee.
Financial Independence Retire Early — "FIRE" — is the goal of accumulating enough invested wealth that the income from your investments covers your living expenses indefinitely. Once you hit your FIRE number, paid work becomes optional. You can quit, downshift, change careers, take a sabbatical year, or just keep working with the security of knowing you don't have to.
The community has converged on a few simple formulas to make the target concrete. This guide walks through the core math (the 4% safe withdrawal rate), the major variants (Lean, Fat, Coast FIRE), the real-world risks that the simple formulas miss, and how to actually run the numbers on your own situation using the FIRE Number Calculator.
The core math: 4% rule and the FIRE number
The headline formula is brutally simple:
FIRE number = annual expenses ÷ safe withdrawal rate
Where the 4% comes from
The 4% safe withdrawal rate comes from the **Trinity Study** (Cooley, Hubbard, Walz, 1998), which back-tested historical US stock and bond returns to find the highest withdrawal rate that would have survived every rolling 30-year period from 1926 onwards.
The conclusion: a portfolio with 50-75% stocks and the rest in bonds, withdrawing 4% in the first year and adjusting that dollar amount for inflation each year afterwards, had a roughly 95% success rate over 30 years. Translation: if you have 25× your annual expenses invested in such a portfolio, you can almost certainly live off it for 30 years.
If your annual expenses are $50,000, your FIRE number at 4% is $1,250,000. At 3%, it's $1,666,667. At 5%, it's $1,000,000.
Lean FIRE, Fat FIRE, Coast FIRE — the variants
The community has invented several flavours of FIRE to reflect different goals:
| Variant | Definition | Example ($50k base expenses) |
|---|---|---|
| Lean FIRE | 75% of normal expenses (minimal lifestyle) | $50k × 0.75 ÷ 4% = $937,500 |
| Regular FIRE | 100% of expenses (Trinity baseline) | $50k ÷ 4% = $1,250,000 |
| Fat FIRE | 150% of expenses (comfortable lifestyle) | $50k × 1.5 ÷ 4% = $1,875,000 |
| Coast FIRE | Today's investment that grows to your FIRE number by traditional retirement age — no further contributions needed | $1.25M ÷ (1.07)^35 ≈ $117,000 |
Coast FIRE is conceptually different: it's a "stop-saving" point, not a "stop-working" point. You still need to cover current expenses, but you don't need to add another dollar to retirement savings.
Why 3-3.5% might be safer for early retirees
The 4% rule was based on a **30-year retirement** — appropriate if you retire at 65 with a 95-year life expectancy. But early retirees aiming to leave work at 40 or 45 are planning for 50+ years of withdrawals. The Trinity Study's success rate drops considerably over longer horizons.
For this reason, many serious FIRE planners use **3% to 3.5%** as their safe withdrawal rate. This raises the FIRE number meaningfully — at 3%, you need 33× expenses, not 25× — but it provides much more buffer against sequence-of-returns risk, longer-than-expected lifespans, and unexpected expenses.
A useful intuition: the difference between 4% and 3% is about a third more savings, but the difference between a 30-year and 50-year time horizon is significantly more years your portfolio needs to survive uninterrupted.
The risks the formula doesn't show
The 25× rule is simple, but its simplicity hides several real risks that can break the math:
- **Sequence-of-returns risk.** A bear market in the *first* few years of retirement does far more damage than the same drop in year 20. You're withdrawing while balances are depressed, locking in losses. A bond ladder or 2-3 years of cash reserves at retirement helps cushion this.
- **Healthcare before Medicare.** In the US, Medicare starts at age 65. Early retirees face $15,000–$25,000/year per couple for ACA marketplace coverage, varying by state and income. Add this to your "annual expenses" line, or your FIRE number is too low.
- **Inflation.** The 4% rule already adjusts for inflation, but only if you assumed a *real* return (after inflation). If you used a nominal 7% return, the actual safe withdrawal in inflation-adjusted dollars is closer to 4%-of-real, not 4%-of-nominal.
- **Taxes.** The simple formula gives gross withdrawals. In practice, traditional 401(k) and IRA withdrawals are taxable as ordinary income; brokerage withdrawals at long-term capital gains rates; Roth withdrawals tax-free. A well-diversified mix can keep effective tax rates very low — but the formula doesn't do this work for you.
- **Lifestyle inflation.** Most people's expenses creep upward over decades. A FIRE number based on today's thrifty 30-year-old expenses may not last a 60-year-old who likes to travel.
How to actually calculate your number
Three steps:
- **Track your annual expenses for 12 months.** Use a tool (Monarch, YNAB, Lunch Money) or even a spreadsheet. Most people guess significantly too low — a year of real data is the only honest input.
- **Add healthcare and discretionary buffer.** If you're US-based and not yet 65, add $15-25k/year per couple for ACA insurance. Add another 10-20% for the discretionary spending early retirement tends to enable (you'll have more free time to spend money).
- **Pick your SWR.** 4% if you're retiring late or comfortable with some risk. 3.5% if early-retiring (under 50). 3% if very risk-averse or planning for 50+ year horizons.
Where the money goes — the FIRE portfolio
Most FIRE portfolios converge on a similar structure: a heavy allocation to global stock index funds (often 70-90%), a smaller bond / cash allocation for stability (10-30%), and increasingly REITs or international equity for diversification. The most-cited template is the "VTSAX and chill" approach — a single low-cost total US stock market fund.
Tax-advantaged accounts come first: max your 401(k) (especially with employer match), max IRA contributions, max HSA if eligible (the HSA Calculator shows the triple-tax-advantage value). Anything above contribution limits goes into a taxable brokerage account.
For UK readers, the equivalent stack is: max your pension (employer match first), max your £20k annual ISA allowance — likely a Stocks & Shares ISA in low-cost global index funds — and use Lifetime ISA contributions for the 25% government bonus if you qualify.
Coast FIRE — the underrated milestone
Coast FIRE is often overlooked but it's arguably the most powerful psychological milestone on the path. It's the point where you have enough invested *today* that, with zero further contributions, the money will grow to your full FIRE number by traditional retirement age.
At a 7% real return, Coast FIRE is about **9%** of your full FIRE number for a 30-year-old with 35 years to traditional retirement age — the horizon shrinks the older you are, since it's simply retirement age minus your current age. So if your target is $1.25M at 65, you only need $117k saved at 30 to "coast" — your existing investments compound to the target on their own.
This matters because it converts the FIRE journey from "savings sprint" to "earn-just-enough-to-cover-current-expenses". After hitting Coast, you can downshift to a lower-paying job you actually enjoy, take long sabbaticals, or work part-time — knowing retirement is already taken care of.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the 4% rule still safe in 2026?
⌄
For 30-year horizons, mostly yes — recent research (Bengen, ERN blog, Morningstar) suggests 4% remains roughly 90-95% safe historically. For 50-year FIRE horizons, more cautious 3-3.5% withdrawal rates are widely recommended.
Does the FIRE number include my home equity?
⌄
Usually no — home equity doesn't generate income unless you sell or take a HELOC. The FIRE number is specifically the amount of *invested* assets needed to throw off enough investment income to cover expenses.
What about Social Security?
⌄
In the US, Social Security at age 67 typically replaces 25-40% of pre-retirement income. If you're comfortable counting on it, you can reduce your FIRE number by the present-value of expected benefits. Conservative FIRE planners ignore Social Security entirely as a margin of safety.
Is FIRE just for high earners?
⌄
It's easier with a high income, but the math is universal — the savings rate matters more than the income. Someone saving 50% of $80k will reach FIRE before someone saving 15% of $200k, all else equal.
What if the market crashes the year I retire?
⌄
This is sequence-of-returns risk in action. Mitigations: a "cash bucket" of 2-3 years of expenses to avoid selling depressed assets, a flexible withdrawal strategy (cut spending in down years), and an initial SWR below 4% (3-3.5%) to build in margin.
Sources
- SEC Investor.gov — Compound interest calculator — Regulator-run tool for testing the accumulation side of a FIRE projection.